Elliot Eisner on Three Curricula
1. If
there is no longer external reward, students lose their motivation in learning.
- I
can relate myself to the above statement that is mentioned in the paper. External
reward comes in various forms. It could be sweets, trophies, scholarships, praise
or recognition. For me, it was marks and grades that motivated me the most to
study subjects in high school. I tended to study certain subjects – biology, chemistry
and mathematics – in which I got high grades, while I avoided studying subjects
– especially literatures – that I did poorly in exams; ultimately, I lost my
interest in literatures.
- While
reading this paper, I was able to relate myself as to my “fear” in literatures
and relate to the reading that was covered in the inquiry class, which was
about our current grading systems. Most students, including myself, get
discouraged when they receive low grades in their assignments or exams. The
main focus of grading students’ works should be on their deeper understating in
learning, not just giving them marks. I strongly believe that shifting focus of
grading from marks to deeper understanding would encourage students to be
active in their learning and motivate them by internal self-reward.
2. “Competitiveness
is not only fostered by the grading system: it is also fostered by the
differentiation of classes into ability groups.”
- Students
who highly achieve in academics are given admission to “honours” classes. The
word, “honours”, is misused, in my opinion, because it gives a notion that most
“average” students are not honourable as their marks are not as high as those
in “honours” classes.
- I
think differentiating classes into ability groups is quite harsh for young
students. It could lower some students’ self-esteem and lead to exhausting
competitions among themselves.
Ways that this might expand our ideas about what is meant by
'curriculum'. How does the mandated BC Provincial Curriculum connect with
Eisner's ideas?
-
There are many changes made in the new B.C.’s
mathematics curriculum, in which I think it is reflective of Eisner’s
description of the null curriculum. The new math curriculum is designed to build upon students' previous learning and ideas. It is consistent across their high school education. Specific focus shifts towards problem solving with real-life connections, including financial literacy and First People's perspectives. Also, it no longer designed in "pathways" with strict pre-requisites, which offers students with a flaxible path through high school math education with the possibility of learning a variety skills.
Comments
Post a Comment